Détails, Fiction et Thinking Fast and Slow summary

Détails, Fiction et Thinking Fast and Slow summary

Blog Article

His credentials are indisputable, and he tries gamely to bring the subject to life, but -- mea culpa -- I just couldn't stay interested in the myriad of data and specific examples. The book is good conscience someone really interested in the details, and it ut contain real life examples, but after 400 pages it's hard to remember them. My takeaway: Our connaissance is frequently wrong, and even our experience (pépite what we believe our experience to have been) may not be reliable as a decision conducteur. So, Si careful!

I think this book is mistitled. Intuition years, I assumed that it was some kind of self-help book about when to trust your gut and when to trust your head, and thus I put off reading it. Plaisant Thinking, Fast and Slow is nothing of the sort.

is kind of like a guest who vue up to your party and then dazzles everyone with an impromptu, 15-minute oration nous the geopolitical profession in South Ossetia; and, everyone applauds and turns to go back to their own entretien, only expérience the guest to launch into another story embout the time they parachuted into the Balkans to break up a nascent Empressé war, a story which is followed quickly by a similar tale of a visit to Southeast Asia….

Resisting this évasé collection of potential availability biases is réalisable, but tiresome. You impératif make the concours to reconsider your impressions and intuitions by asking such demande as, "Is our belief that thefts by teenagers are a Initial problem due to a few recent instances in our neighborhood?

A premortem attempts to counter optimism bias by requiring team members to imagine that a project oh gamin very, very badly and write daniel kahneman thinking fast and slow a sentence or two describing how that happened. Conducting this exercise, it turns désuet, assistance people think ahead.

Année mortel principle of skill training: rewards conscience improved geste work better than punishment of mistakes. This enchère is supported by much evidence from research nous-mêmes pigeons, rats, humans, and other animals.

in which people let their likes and dislikes determine their beliefs about the world. Your political preference determines the raison that you find compelling.

I went along with it, plaisant I couldn't believe that this would eventually become ration of a paper. It was a plaisanterie. I'm afraid you can't go through a similar experience and take these studies seriously from then on.

I have attempted to summarize some heuristics, biases and psychological principle that I thought would make a fascinating admission to tempt a novice like me to further explore the subject.

Some subjects played the Jeu, which takes about three hours to intact, while others watched a video embout cognitive bias. All were tested je bias-mitigation skills before the training, immediately afterward, and then finally after eight to 12 weeks had passed.

I told him that recoin cadeau't remember the last throw and so the odds of getting a tail was still 50%, as it had previously been. Délicat I had no credibility - I'd already told him I never bet - so, how would I possibly know anything if I wasn't even courageux enough to put my own money je the outcome? And didn't I understand the cote of this story was he had already WON?

Priming is not limited to notion and words; your actions and emotions can Si primed by events of which you are not even aware, including primitif gestures.

Complex theories and représentation are explained in relatively simple language and accompanied by many examples. There is no need connaissance any special knowledge to absorb this work of nenni-trouvaille and enjoy the process of reading, although it contains a lot of statistics.

Both systems have values built into them and any system of decision-making that edits them désuet is doomed to undercut itself. Some specifics that struck me: